Planning meals to train well with a busy schedule

Many athletes know the food they could eat, but come to the end of the day without having been able to consume it. Chapter 8 deals with the distance between information and execution.

The author organizes eating habits so that the plan survives work, commuting and training hours. The main idea is to reduce predictable improvisations without turning the routine into a rigid menu.

Organize times of opportunity, not an imaginary day

Start by identifying when there is real access to food. The break that seems free can coincide with a meeting, a journey or the time to seek material for training.

If the interval between lunch and exercise is usually long, this stretch needs early solution. Waiting to be very hungry to look for something can leave the athlete with few options or very close to the session.

The goal is not to eat by the clock indifferent to the needs. It is to recognize where the routine usually prevents food and prepare alternatives.

A meal needs to do more than one task

The chapter recommends combining food groups. The function is to prevent the meal from repeatedly reducing to a single component.

An energy base, a protein source and other foods that expand variety offer a reasoning structure. Fats also participate in the composition and satisfaction with the meal.

Quantities do not need to be equal every day. A day with more training can require an organization other than a light period.

The structure makes it easy to adapt dishes without relying on a closed list of substitutions.

Use a simple matrix to solve what is missing

Consider these editorial examples:

The exact food depends on preferences, restrictions and need. The matrix shows that the problem may be in the system, not in the ignorance of a recipe.

Planning some meals reduces repeated decisions

The author suggests thinking about simple preparations before the week and keeping basic food available. Cooking for more than one meal can reduce the effort of each day.

This does not require repeating everything. The same basis can receive different accompaniments and preparation. The important decision is that there is usable food when the time is short.

A freezer with ready portions or an organized pantry changes the likelihood of the meal happening. The plan depends less on extra disposition after training.

Snacks connect parts of the day

A snack has a function when it solves a break or complements something that has become insufficient. It does not need to be chosen by the word fitness in the package.

Fruit with yogurt, bread with a protein source or other family combinations can perform different tasks. The choice close to exercise considers time and tolerance.

Editorial example: a snack in the middle of the afternoon can make the bridge until training. Consuming the same amount immediately before running can produce another experience. The food has not changed; the window has changed.

Thus, the chapter teaches how to relate what to eat to the moment it will be used.

Bar can be support without becoming the whole feed

The author recognizes the practicality of bars and similar products in displacements and situations of little access. Its value is to avoid a gap or facilitate a certain task.

The problem arises when convenience continuously replaces varied meals without the athlete realizing what he has stopped consuming.

Read the label: a carbohydrates-rich bar, a protein and another with plenty of fat or fiber do not perform exactly the same function before a session.

The question is what that option solves at that time.

Distributing protein is different from concentrating everything on dinner

The book encourages the inclusion of protein sources in meals. This also helps to identify patterns on which the day is made up of small snacks and the only consistent meal remains for the night.

Editorial update: the AIS values the distribution of protein foods throughout the day, in addition to the total consumed.

The application does not require buying a supplement for each break. First examine what the meals already offer and where the gaps are.

Pleasant food also fits

The chapter prevents organization from becoming an absolute prohibition. Sweets and other foods chosen for pleasure can coexist with a food that meets the needs.

The criterion is the pattern and context. Using a food outside of a rigid classification does not mean that the day has lost value, and trying to compensate with restriction can worsen the sequence.

Flexibility makes the routine more adaptable to conviviality, travel and unforeseen events. A plan that requires perfect conditions tends to be less executable.

Editorial application: mount a plan A and a plan B

A person wishes to have a meal ready after running. If there is a delay, he/she has a simple combination of accessible foods so that he/she does not skip all food.

Plan B does not need to exactly imitate A. It needs to preserve the main functions: energy, recovery components and viability.

Also note where the drink will be and how the meal will be transported or stored. Access and conservation are part of the execution.

What to observe after a week

Ask which meals happened, which missed and why. Adjust the point that presented difficulty, rather than redesigning everything with greater complexity.

The essence of the chapter is to make the basics repeatable. Useful food planning reduces the number of times the athlete arrives tired, hungry and without an option available.

Primary reference: EBERLE, Suzanne Girard. Endurance Sports Nutrition. 2nd ed. Human Kinetics, 2007. Cap. 8, “Planning Meals for Endurance Athletes”. Explanatory summary in our own words. Numerical examples and situations identified as editorials are from Enduran-se.

Sources for editorial updates:

• Australian Institute of Sport — proteins in sports nutrition.

Cada um no seu ritmo. Juntos no caminho.